Shocking Photo: Desmond Elliot Shot and Slaughtered in a Hotel in Nigeria

COURTESY OF NAIJA EXPOSED

Reports reaching us states that, Desmond Elliot who stands in to be Nigerians Hugest Movie Act got Butchered in a Hotel situated in Lekki (Nigeria).
A Photo was sent to us as a source of prove via email by a nameless spy who refused to release his name to us.
As a matter of fact, Movie fans who first heard the news in Nigeria are in shaking‚ feathers and Investigations are pending right about now. We promise as much as possible to give full details of this shocking occurrence. Keep fingers cross and watch out for the Upcoming with dubbed  REFLECTION starring Desmond Elliot playing this role. Its A Movie so don’t Panic -
 COURTESY OF NAIJA EXPOSED

Supreme Court ISHINDWE— Raila criticises the Supreme Court...

Supreme Court ISHINDWE— Raila criticises the Supreme Court...

Courtesy of CORD 254

Prime Minister Raila Odinga has criticized the decision by the Supreme Court to uphold the election of Uhuru Kenya as Kenya’s fourth president.

Raila said the decision by the county’s highest court was unpopular, as he dismissed it.

“Supreme Court ishindwe (May the Supreme Court be defeated,” he said.

The premier said the decision by the top court was tantamount to the persecution of Jesus Christ.

“The decision is like the persecution of Jesus Christ that occurred over 2000 years ago. Like Jesus, I am still alive,” said the premier, when he addressed crowds in Kondele area, Kisumu on Friday.

He said the Supreme Court, under its President Willy Mutunga, made its decision during Easter, on the same period Jesus was persecuted, died and rose.

Raila said he would continue with the fight for democracy, despite losing the presidency.

He urged Kenyans to continue to fight for justice and democracy, adding that he would spearhead this fight.

“When the cooking stick breaks, it does not mean the process of preparing meals should stop,” he said

Carrying a black Bible and dressed in a checked blue shirt, the premier said Kenyans had been let down by last week decision.

“Kenyan waited anxiously for the ruling. However, they were betrayed with the court’s ruling that was intended to kill his political career,” said Raila, amid chants from the crowd.

“We presented adequate evidence to the Supreme but it was expunged without any consideration,” said a visibly angry Raila.

Earlier, while addressing youth in Jua Kali area, he was presented with a Bible and urged to swear as a president.

However, he held it up and said ‘Praise God!’

Uhuru, 51, is set to be sworn in as president on Tuesday, at an elaborate ceremony to be held at Moi Sport Centre Kasarani.

Among foreign dignitaries expected to attend the function is Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni. He is set to be the only guest who will speak apart from outgoing President Kibaki and Uhuru.

Last Saturday, the Supreme ruled that Uhuru and his running William Ruto were validly elected after garnering 50.07 per cent in the final tally by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC).

The judges, a ruling read by Mutunga, dismissed two petitions challenging Uhuru’s election, including one filed by Raila, who obtained 43.7 per cent in the election held on March 4.

Soon after the judgment, the PM said he had accepted the verdict but did not entirely agree with the some of its findings.

This is owing to numerous anomalies Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (CORD) presented to court.

On Friday, Raila visited several places in the lakeside town and opened a hotel owned by National Assembly member for Gem Constituency Jakoyo Midiwo.

On Thursday, Raila said CORD would stand as the main Opposition party in Parliament to keep Uhuru’s Government in check.

He accused the Jubilee Coalition of plotting to weaken the Opposition by seeking post-election alliances with small parties.

We presented adequate evidence to the Supreme but it was expunged without any consideration,” said a visibly angry Raila.

 

Earlier, while addressing youth in Jua Kali area, he was presented with a Bible and urged to swear as a president.

However, he held it up and said ‘Praise God!’

 

Uhuru, 51, is set to be sworn in as president on Tuesday, at an elaborate ceremony to be held at Moi Sport Centre Kasarani.

 

Among foreign dignitaries expected to attend the function is Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni. He is set to be the only guest who will speak apart from outgoing President Kibaki and Uhuru.

Last Saturday, the Supreme ruled that Uhuru and his running William Ruto were validly elected after garnering 50.07 per cent in the final tally by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC).

 

The judges, a ruling read by Mutunga, dismissed two petitions challenging Uhuru’s election, including one filed by Raila, who obtained 43.7 per cent in the election held on March 4.

 

Soon after the judgment, the PM said he had accepted the verdict but did not entirely agree with the some of its findings.

This is owing to numerous anomalies Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (CORD) presented to court.

 

On Friday, Raila visited several places in the lakeside town and opened a hotel owned by National Assembly member for Gem Constituency Jakoyo Midiwo.

On Thursday, Raila said CORD would stand as the main Opposition party in Parliament to keep Uhuru’s Government in check.

He accused the Jubilee Coalition of plotting to weaken the Opposition by seeking post-election alliances with small parties.

Among the parties Jubilee has formed alliances with include Kanu, New Ford-Kenya and Peoples Democratic Party.

 

Courtesy of CORD 254

Bensouda faint in shock as Three more ICC witnesses refuse to testify against Uhuru

Bensouda faint in shock as Three more ICC witnesses refuse to testify against Uhuru

The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has suffered another setback in her case against President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta.

 
Just three months to the start of Uhuru’s trial on July 11 at The Hague, it is emerging that three prosecution witnesses have refused to testify against him.


Witnesses Number 2, 9, and 10 were among the 12 Bensouda relied on to have the charges against Uhuru confirmed by the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II in January last year.

Recently, the prosecutor dropped another, Witness Number 4, in the case against Uhuru citing credibility issues after he recanted his testimony. 


This also prompted Bensouda to withdraw the charges against Uhuru’s former co-accused, Francis Muthaura, a former Head of the Civil Service and Secretary to the Cabinet. Uhuru’s lawyers and the prosecution have battled over the implication of the shelving of Witness Number Four’s testimony, with Uhuru insisting charges against him ought to be withdrawn too.


Trial Chamber V judges are yet to rule on the application by Uhuru’s legal team.
In the latest submission to the court, in response to earlier submissions by Uhuru’s lawyers, Bensouda discloses that Witnesses two, nine and 10 have changed their minds after having earlier expressed willingness to, citing security threats and fears of retaliation against their families.

Rethinking decision

In a detailed submission to the three judges of Trial Chamber V, Bensouda explained the circumstances in which each of the witnesses had balked.

“When the Prosecution contacted Witness Two on November 3, 2012, to confirm his availability to testify, he said he was rethinking his decision,” the prosecution says in the court filing dated March 28.


She added: “The Prosecution made several attempts to persuade Witness Two to testify, either as a Prosecution or as a Court witness, but on November 20, 2012, he informed the Prosecution that his decision not to testify was final.” The Prosecutor also said that Witness Nine informed her office on August 17, last year, that he was unsure whether he could continue to co-operate with her office.


The witness, Bensouda added, developed cold feet due to what she termed as “concerns about retaliation against his family from the accused persons”.

“On August 28, 2012, he indicated that he would testify only if he could do so completely anonymously, because he did not want to put anyone’s life in danger.  He reaffirmed this position on September 15, 2012,” the prosecutor said in the submission.


During a psychosocial assessment early last year, Witness 10 had stated that he did not feel like testifying during the trials.

She said that the witness and his lawyer informed the prosecution they had received harassing telephone calls and wanted to withdraw his co-operation.


“When Prosecution representatives met with Witness 10 on August 15, 2012, to discuss his concerns, he stated that he did not want to testify for health and security reasons,” she explained.

Bensouda has insisted witness Number 4 was bribed to recant his evidence. The witness lied that he was present during meetings where retaliatory attacks were planned.

The dropping of the witness has now turned out to be the new battlefront between the prosecution and President-elect Uhuru’s defence team. Uhuru’s lawyers argue that confirmation of charges was based on false testimony and have petitioned the Trial Chamber to refer the case back to the Pre-Trial Chamber II for reconsideration.


The trial in the case against Deputy President-elect William Ruto and Radio Journalist Joshua arap Sang, which is scheduled to begin on May 28, also face similar challenges.
A witness lined up to testify in the Ruto case has since stepped down.

The truth

The witness, who comes from Rift Valley, wrote to the ICC prosecutor withdrawing evidence attributed to him. He asked to have his name removed from the list of prosecution witnesses.

“I have never personally visited any of the homes of William Ruto and I did not witness any event and cannot vouch for the truth or otherwise of any allegation that has been made or attributed to me against him,” said the witness in an affidavit, contrary to his earlier evidence.

But in a submission dated last week, Bensouda maintained that the Pre-Trial Chamber II did not rely on evidence provided by Witness 4 with respect to the infamous State House meeting.


“Even a cursory review of the confirmation decision demonstrates that the Pre-Trial Chamber did not rely on Witness 4’s evidence at all with respect to the December 30, State House meeting. Its findings were based on the evidence of Witnesses 11, 12, and six,” she said.

Meanwhile, Common Legal Representative for Victims Fergal Gaynor maintained that the judges should not hesitate to make full use of the Court’s powers to compel the Government to provide the prosecution with critical evidence.

“In cases such as the present case, in which the prosecution has reported State obstruction in attempting to access relevant evidence, and unprecedented levels of witness intimidation…. “The Trial Chamber should not hesitate to make full use of its powers under Article 64(6) (d) and 69(3) to impose appropriate sanctions for any offences against the administration of justice,” said Gaynor.

Integrity or validity


He disapproved the withdrawal of charges against Muthaura, saying the reasons the prosecution gave cannot be allowed to stand as an incentive “to those who would seek to undermine the work of this Court through bribery, intimidation, and blocking access to relevant evidence”.

The victims’ lawyer also opposed a request by Uhuru that his case be referred to the Pre-Trial Chamber.

Gaynor maintained that the Trial Chamber has no jurisdiction under the Rome Statute to entertain any appeal or application for judicial review of the confirmation decision.

He said that Trial Bench has no powers to inquire into the fairness, integrity, or validity of the confirmation proceedings terming the request as a delaying tactic.

Why my wife will hold Bible with me­—Uhuru Kenyatta....

Why my wife will hold Bible with me­—Uhuru Kenyatta.....

President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta has re-affirmed the need to have his wife hold the Bible with him as he takes his oath of office, saying it will keep him grounded on his vows to the Kenyan people.

Kenyatta, who is due to be sworn in as the fourth President of Kenya on April 9, tweeted and posted on Facebook that holding the Bible together would mean that his wife, Margaret, also commits herself to the pledge.

“I promised to uphold family values and by having her stand alongside me, we will not only be vowing individually as recognised by the Constitution but also collectively as recognised by our marriage vows also enshrined in the law,” he explained.

He at the same time clarified that his wife would hold the Bible with him and not for him, to remind him of the promises he made to Kenyans.

Kenyatta added that the significant act would also serve as an assurance that family obligations would not interfere with his duties as president.

“She will be committing herself to ensure she reminds me of my promise to the Kenyan people and also assuring Kenyans that family obligations will not interfere with my execution of duties as president,” he said.

The announcement this week elicited a great debate with a cross section of Kenyans supporting it while others argued that it was ill informed. 

Some of those who spoke to Capital FM News commended him while some even argued that the act symbolised a transfer of power from Kenyatta to his wife.

“If he has a strong family, I can assure you we shall have a strong government. His wife will always be there to remind him of the promises,” Francis Njogu commented.

“Uhuru is trying to ape US President Barack Obama but Obama does not have the ICC case tying him down. Most people are trying to imagine that once Uhuru leaves for The Hague, he will leave the powers to his wife,” argued Wycliffe Omondi. 

“I may not have been your supporter nor am I happy that you won, but by bringing ur dear wife on board, you have convinced me that our mothers should look up to you and ur wife. Congrats Mheshimiwa!” Mohammed Hassan posted on Facebook.

“All Kenyans should emulate our next President. This is a message to women who have always cried for gender balance,” Tando Rajura said.

This will not be the first time a president-elect holds the Bible together with his wife while taking the oath of office. 

Obama took his oath placing his hand on the Bible that was held by First Lady Michelle as his daughters looked on.

Kisumu Residents Swear in RAILA as their President...See photo..

Kisumu Residents Swear in RAILA as their President...See photo..

On his tour to Kisumu today after the disappointment by the Supreme court, Raila was welcomed with cheers and jubilations by his supporters.

His supporters had carried a bible together with them to swear him.

Dr Raila Odinga was given a black bible by his supporters to swear as the Peoples President, He however lifted the bible and said "Praise God"

 

 

More details of this story to follow...

Uhuru Wants his wife to hold Bible for him during oath taking...

Uhuru Wants his wife to hold Bible for him during oath taking...

President elect Uhuru Kenyatta has requested that his wife Margaret Kenyatta holds the bible as he places his hand on it during his swearing-in ceremony.
The Chief of the Defence Forces General Julius Karangi made the revelation on Wednesday.
Karangi is spearheading rehearsals at the Moi International Sports Complex.

Uhuru will be sworn in on Tuesday March, 9.

SHOCKING....See What Some People Do In Nightclubs…Seriously

SHOCKING....See What Some People Do In Nightclubs…Seriously

This picture was taken at a  Nairobi nightclub.While others are busy dancing in the nightclub, others are busy making love.. Like this couple which was caught on camera for example. Hmm, things are really happening.

How can the girl even allow the guy to do this to her in public?

Why should people engage in shameful acts and blame it on photo editing?

Please express your opinion below