ATTACKS ON SOCIAL MEDIA INSINCERE
By Kohadha Roy Ogolla
The government seems to be moving towards blocking most social media
outlets in this country, for fear of the use of these networking tools
to force an uprising after word went out that the March 4
th elections were not free and fair to its entirety.
Make no mistake; social media is a powerful weapon against tyranny.
It works great to get a company to admit they are at fault or get a
government to admit it is no longer worthy of serving its people.
Whatever the point is, when there is a problem, and social media is
available to help solve it, the problem usually gets solved.
Unfortunately in Kenya the government believes they can stop social
media and therefore resist efforts to help their people live better
lives. Given what has happened recently in the Middle East, this seems
highly unlikely.
Social media is believed to have played a major role in uprisings in
North Africa, including the popular movements that forced out Egyptian
President Hosni Mubarak and Ben Ali of Tunisia and is playing a major
role in the Syria uprising where the President Assad’s government has
managed to ban any media from accessing the atrocities in the year long
civil war.
In Kenya, the story seems to be taking a different turn… There has
been a systematic attack on the social media from the traditional media,
the church and now the government. All who accuse the social media of
spreading ethnic animosity and hate following the contested general
elections.
One is struck at how traditional media and organization that use the
media seem to be of the mind that “something has to be done,” even as
they make efforts of their own to engage with their audiences through
social media. It’s almost as though, having lost the means of
controlling the message, they would now rather exert some control over
social media itself. The multitude of bloggers, forum members and
tweeters is too immense, too fragmented to corral, so the implicit
threat of legal action is used. The speed at which information can be
disseminated means that traditional journalism can find itself playing
catch-up, so social media storms are dismissed as incoherent, messy, or
simply well-meaning idiots succumbing to mob mentality.
This is a trend that must not be agreed to by any sane human being. I
detest with all possible terms. First, because suing somebody who
writes something you disagree with is, in most cases, using the
proverbial sledgehammer to crack a nut. Second, because bloggers and
readers who also use social media are probably better-informed than some
traditional journalists think. Yes, it can seem overwhelming when an
item is trending, but people do have the choice as to whether or not to
retweet, share or re-blog. Aside from the spammers, nobody has an
incentive to hitch their wagon to a topic. It is the ease with which
views can be expressed that has changed, not the level of engagement.
I’m not trying to paint the social media white and say it’s all
angelic. It is true that the social media in Kenya has been used for
nearly all good intentions until the recent backlash in the elections
that have seen many Kenyans vent their anger at the elections on social
media with opposing sides pulling different directions. It’s true that
the Post Election Violence, has gone “digital” with a host of “not so
kind statements” that would probably not feel comfortable saying finding
their way into the social media posted under pseudo names. But before
we turn the attention to the bloodletting on social media, let us ask
ourselves where the rain started ‘beating’ us.
In the run up to the 2007 General Elections and in the events that
followed in 2007/2008 post election violence, the media was blamed for
either being extremely partisan or simply being oblivious of fair and
just reporting. An argument that will need another forum to fully
exhaust… Fast track to 2013, the media this time round played “by
standers” not wanting to be seen as the agents of war as was the case in
2007/2008. Various media houses, through the Media Owners Association
and Media Council of Kenya, were forced to sign a Code of Ethics for
reporting the election process. Journalists were given stern “warnings”
on what to report and what is newsworthy and that is where the plot was
lost.
When the tallying process of the presidential elections ran into
trouble at the Bomas of Kenya, the media, keeping in touch with Code of
Ethics, maintained a buffer zone and questioned no one. The proverbial
“see no evil, say no evil” was put to play. Kenya’s saw the numerous
discrepancies, but the media said nothing about them and that is where
the social media offered a “discussion platform” for the majority. They
went on facebook and twitter to share their experiences, their
disgruntlement and their hope that all would be well.
All these, even when the traditional kept their composure and urged
Kenyans to maintain peace, when there was no need for the call for
peace… to resume work, when everyone was busy thinking of life after
elections and to accept the results/outcomes of the elections a whooping
72 hours before official results were announced.
Whereas previously, public reaction to a particular newspaper article
may have been gauged by the number of letters sent to the editor, today
people can express their opinion wherever they like, and others can
chime in to voice their agreement or disagreement, without having to set
up a petition or letter-writing campaign.
Change can be unsettling, and as the media landscape changes, there
are bound to be more debates and arguments about the role and
responsibilities of traditional media, social networks, and how people
and businesses use them. While I don’t think that the internet is a free
utopia where nothing bad ever happens, neither do I see it as a lawless
Wild West where chaos reigns. Social networking is largely being,
provided you are willing to get involved. It’s those who are determined
to keep a hands-off approach that is likely to face the biggest
challenges.
In real sense, the fence seating by the traditional media, the church
and to the greater extent the government is the main reason why social
media is what it is today and attempts to gag it and paint it evil is
just but another avenue for the three to run away from the reality of
their failures yet again. So before the church, the government and the
social media through the goblet the social media direction… Let them
first remove the splint in their own eyes before noticing the log in the
eyes of social media users.
The writer is a Blogger and Social Justice Activist
(PHOTO)Nigerian
JUJU men heading home after their mission was termed unsuccessful...
..They could not put the Kenyan players into bottles.The match between Kenya and Nigeria ended on a 1-1 draw.
#SomeoneTellNigeria
Only in their movies a woman puts poison in her husbands food.And then taste it
to know if its enough,without her dying
You have seen her releasing controversial
photos mainly showing off her big booty. Well, recently she released her bikini
photos and a few days back she released her totally unclad photo just to leave
the men drooling.
This real it happened to me on Sunday. I went to town to buy
a phone cover downtown. At the shops opposite Afya center or Ukwala and Tuskys,
everywhere I went they kept asking me to show the phone despite the fact that I
mentioned the make
CONFIRMED...TNA PROPAGANDIST DENNIS ITUMBI ACCUSED BY NCIC TO BE SPEARHEADING TRIBALISM N HATESPEECH ONLINE
SHOCKING PHOTO OF KIBAKI'S SISTER ....... 
